When flustered consumers inevitably find themselves in the market for something they know nothing about, they turn to recommendation sites to guide them toward the least wretched umbrella or the most durable router. These digital shopping companions—influenced by both the rigorous testing of Consumer Reports and the snarky, conversational tone of the Internet—like Wirecutter, The Strategist, and Reviewed, have brought their own vetting standards and mission statements to the space. But can they coexist? This article was originally published in November 2017. It has been updated.
Major site recommendation
In a product landscape 메이저사이트 추천 flooded with Amazon reviews, SEO-heavy personal blogs, Gwyneth Paltrow’s apps, and the occasional YouTube review from a random influencer, editorially-minded recommendations sites have emerged as life rafts for flustered shoppers. But despite their similarities, they vary widely in both the quality of their research and their mission statements. Wirecutter, The Strategist, and Reviewed exemplify the variety of methodologies and vetting standards in this new era of shopping companions.
About Major site recommendation
With the advent of sites like Wirecutter, Reviewed, and The Strategist, a new generation of editorial-minded shopping companions has emerged to calm flustered shoppers and link them to a solution. These sites offer a life raft in a sea of product recommendations—be it Amazon reviews, SEO-heavy personal blogs, Gwyneth Paltrow’s apps, or YouTube video review pages. They range in vetting standards and mission statements, but all are useful to customers who need a trusted guide.
No comments:
Post a Comment